Theresa Caballero
300 East Main Street, Suite 1136, El Paso, Texas 79901
theresacaballerolaw.com
Representing Clients In All Criminal Law Matters Including: DWI, Traffic Violations, Drug Crimes, Bond Reduction, Family Violence & Court Martial.
Frequently Asked Questions


Q: What is the difference between "DWI" and "DUI"?

A: "DWI" stands for "driving while impaired" while "DUI" represents "driving under the influence." There is also a third, common term "OWI" or "operating while impaired." All three terms represent operating a motor vehicle after consuming enough alcohol to register a specific blood-alcohol level. Most states set the level at .1, although some states have or are considering lowering the level to .08.


Q: Do I have to take a breath test or can I insist on another test?

A: All of the portable devices used by police have to be approved by the National Highway Traffic Safety Administration and should be problem-free if maintained and used correctly.

Whether you have the option to choose the test you take depends on the state you are in when stopped. Refusing to take a blood-alcohol test can have serious consequences, including suspension of your license and being prosecuted for drunk driving.


Q: Do I have to submit to a field sobriety test?

A: Field sobriety tests are used by an officer to help determine if, in his or her opinion, you are under the influence of alcohol and should be arrested for drunk driving. The officer may place you through a series of balance (walking an imaginary line or leaning back with eyes closed), coordination (counting on the fingers or touching a finger to your nose while your eyes are closed), or mental (reciting the alphabet or counting backwards) tests. The tests are often viewed as additional evidence which the suspect inevitably "fails". Whether you must comply will depend on the state you are in when stopped and requested to take the test.


Q: Can I be stopped and arrested for DWI even if the vehicle was not moving?

A: It depends on the state you are in. In some states, the law says that a person is guilty of drunk driving only when actually operating the vehicle. In other states, having the key in the ignition will satisfy that the intent if there was the ability to operate the vehicle.


Q: What is the "open container" law?

A: Open container laws prohibit the possession of any open alcoholic beverage container and the consumption of any alcoholic beverage in the passenger area of a motor vehicle.


Q: What are the penalties for a DUI conviction?

A: The penalties for a DUI conviction will vary from state to state and depend, in a large part, on whether this is a first, second, third or subsequent conviction.

All states impose penalties that include some or all of the following:

  • Fines, increasing with subsequent offenses
  • Screening for substance abuse
  • Community service
  • Suspension of driver's license, increasing with each offense
  • Point charges against the defendant's license up through revocation of the license for a predetermined period of time
  • Felony conviction with jail or prison time for a third or subsequent conviction


Q: If my driver's license is suspended, how can I get it back?

A: "Occupational licenses" are available under many different circumstances. The judge must find that an "essential need" exists, such as school or job commuting. The license is restricted as to routes, areas and times.


Q: What is the definition of ?entrapment??

A: "Entrapment" is a defense to a criminal charge raised in cases where overzealous law enforcement agents induce a person to commit a crime. The theory behind the defense of entrapment is that we shouldn?t punish someone who was induced by the government to commit a crime.

A valid entrapment defense has two related components:

  • Governmental inducement of the crime and
  • Lack of predisposition on the part of the defendant to commit the crime

The defendant has the initial burden of proving the government induced him to commit the crime. Then the burden rests on the government to overcome an entrapment defense by proving beyond a reasonable doubt that the defendant was predisposed to commit the crime.

Entrapment occurs when the criminal design starts with law enforcement officers, who plant the idea to commit the crime in the mind of an innocent person, and then convince him to do the crime so they can prosecute him.

"Predisposition" focuses on whether the defendant was an unwary innocent who, but for the inducement of the officers, wouldn?t have committed the crime.

The fact that law enforcement agents provide the opportunity or place for the crime doesn't add up to entrapment. It's only entrapment when the idea for committing the crime is planted in the defendant's mind by law enforcement.


Q: When should an insanity defense be considered?

A: The insanity defense is based on the belief that it is inherently unfair to punish people for their criminal acts if they're not mentally responsible for those acts. The most popular definition of insanity is the "McNaghten rule," which defines insanity as "the inability to distinguish right from wrong." Some have amended their laws to include standards of "diminished capacity" or "guilty but mentally ill."

Some states also allow defendants to argue that that they understood their behavior was criminal, but were unable to control it. This is sometimes called the "irresistible impulse" defense.

It should be noted that the insanity defense is not used as often as the general population may believe. Judges and juries frequently don't accepted it, and a determination of insanity doesn't mean the individual will go free but rather that the defendant is confined to a mental institution.


Q: What does it mean when someone is declared "incompetent to stand trial?"

A: "Incompetent to stand trial" refers to a defendant's mindset at time of trial. Usually, a trial will not proceed until a defendant is deemed competent to understand the charges and face his or her accusers.


Q: When is self defense a defense?

A: The defense of "self defense" is what?s called an "affirmative defense." The prosecution must disprove self-defense beyond a reasonable doubt.

While the law as to self-defense may vary from state to state, generally a person is justified in using physical force when it's necessary to defend himself or a third person from what he reasonably believes to be the use or imminent use of unlawful physical force by the other person.

How much force can you exert in self-defense? The degree of force you reasonably believe to be necessary to defend yourself or another person from an unlawful use of force.

Can you ever respond to an attack or threat of an attack by using deadly force? Deadly physical force may be used only if you reasonably believe a lesser degree of force is inadequate, and you have a reasonable belief that you or another person is in imminent danger of being killed or of sustaining great bodily injury.

You aren't justified in using physical force if you provoke the use of unlawful physical force by another person. And you can?t justify your use of physical force if you're the initial aggressor, unless you?ve communicated your withdrawal from the encounter and the other person continues using unlawful physical force. Also, physical force isn't justified where it's the result of an unauthorized combat by agreement.

Some states have "make my day" laws which allow a person to use deadly physical force against an intruder they believe has unlawfully entered their home with the intent to commit a crime once inside. These laws assume that citizens have a right to expect absolute safety within their homes.


Q: What is an alibi?

A: In order to establish an alibi, an individual must be able to provide proof that he or she was not at the scene of the crime. Often testimony from other individuals can be used to establish where the person was, or wasn't. Other records such as videos that are date-and time-stamped, or work records can help establish the location of an individual at the time the crime was committed.


Q: How can I defend myself against charges of having sex with a minor?

A: The age of consent varies from state to state, and it won't help you to prove you didn't know the youthful age of the victim. You can't raise the defenses of mistake or lack of knowledge of the age of the victim as a defense. In most states, engaging in sexual intercourse with a person under the lawful age of consent constitutes a violation of law regardless of your belief as to the person's age.

Of course, you may have other defenses to the charge. In order to determine what defense you might raise, and your chances of succeeding, you should contact a criminal defense lawyer in your area who's experienced in defending charges of sexual assault against minors.


Q: How can a lawyer best save his client from the death penalty?

A: Most crimes for which the death penalty is a possible punishment are violent crimes such as murder, rape, kidnapping and the like. In these types of crimes, very often the perpetrator will leave his DNA behind, either on the victim or at the crime scene. This is the best way for a defense lawyer to prove actual innocence.

DNA testing can positively exclude someone as the perpetrator of a crime. But because it's so expensive, and people charged with crime are often poor and dependent on court-ordered funding for their defense, oftentimes it isn't done. If you believe you or someone you know has been wrongfully charged with a crime, make sure you ask you lawyer to seek out any possible DNA evidence for testing. If necessary, apply for the court to pay for it.

This web site is designed for general information only. The information presented at this site should not be construed to be formal legal advice nor the formation of a lawyer/client relationship.